Trump’s America: Will “we” be fine? Depends on who is “we”. Depends on what “we” do.

18 Nov

dealer-of-hegemonic-masculinity-cdarcypusher-of-hegemonic-masculinity-cdarcy

Dear White Men,

This is on us. And now it’s up to us to undo it. I keep hearing us say: “we’ll be fine.” We may be shocked, devastated, disappointed, outraged but we also keep telling ourselves “we’ll” be fine. Sure, “we” will. But not all will, and not all are. If you are saying “we will be fine”, think hard about who that “we” is. Because many are not part of the “we” that will be fine. Our friends of color, our Native American friends, our Muslim friends and Latino friends, our LGBTQ friends and the women in our lives are not fine. And they are more than devastated and shocked. They are afraid of what is to come. And they will be, and already are, under attack. If you’ve ever questioned the existence of the concept of privilege, being able to say “we’ll be fine” is painful proof of its existence:

Being able to say “we’ll be fine” after an unapologetically racist bigot has been elected president is white privilege.

Being able to say “we’ll be fine” after a man has been elected president who has vowed to block people from entering the US because of their religion – that is privilege.

Being able to say “we’ll be fine” after a man has been elected president who has repeatedly called Latinos rapists and criminals, and who has promised to tear families apart by deporting millions of Latinos – that is white privilege.

Being able to say “we’ll be fine” after a man has been elected president whose choice(s) for the Supreme Court will all but certainly threaten access to safe abortions – that is male privilege.

Being able to say “we’ll be fine” after a man has been elected president who has boasted about sexual assault and who is normalizing misogynist language in the public sphere – that is male privilege.

Being able to say “we’ll be fine” when a man will be vice president who opposes laws against the discrimination of LGBT individuals, who opposes legal equality of non-heterosexual partnerships and who has advocated for “gay conversion therapy” – that is straight privilege.

Being able to say “we’ll be fine” after tens of millions of people have shown their disregard for the basic safety and humanity for LGBT individuals, Muslims, Latinos, African Americans, women and People of Color across the US by voting for Trump’s white supremacist agenda – that is privilege.

And being able to say “we’ll be fine” when racists, white supremacists, misogynists, homophobes and bigots across the country are feeling emboldened by the outcome of this election and who have no qualms threatening and attacking minority communities in schools, on college campuses, at workplaces, and on the streets – that is privilege.

And, ultimately, being able to sit this election out because we don’t agree with either candidate – as opposed to voting for who we perceive as the lesser evil in order to protect the basic human rights of communities of color – that is privilege. (And I agree: It is outrageous to have to make this decision in a democracy but, sadly, it is the reality, and this choice has been the reality for non-privileged communities long before this election).

This is on us

No, everything will not be ok. And while “we” may be fine, many will not. And this is on us. It was our fathers, brothers, uncles and grandpas who have put this administration in power. Our childhood friends, neighbors and college classmates. And some of our mothers, aunts, and grandmas, too. It is on us for not working hard enough to educate them, challenge them, convince them. It is on us for not preventing them – “us” – from making a decision that puts communities in danger and that may well result in the destruction of hard-fought progress that has been won against fierce backlash. It is on us for not having done enough to dismantle white supremacy, racism, patriarchy, dominant versions of masculinity and economic inequality.

Sure, this is also on decades of tone-deafness and opportunism in the Democratic Party. It is also on a corporate media more interested in ratings and the spectacle of the horse race than in substantive issues and informing the public. The Democratic Party is what it is because of our uncritical participation in it and the media is what it is because of our uncritical consumption of it. So make no mistake about it, this is, ultimately, on us.

It’s up to us. Get to work.

And that’s why it’s also up to us to rectify this. Not to lead, but to listen to those under attack, and to stand up for and stand with them.

As communities under threat are in grief and shock, it is up to us to tell them that they are not alone – and it is up to us to tell the bigots that they will never run our communities.

When it becomes more difficult for communities under attack to speak out and speak up, it is up to us to raise our voices and, more importantly, to amplify theirs.

And if they are coming for our brothers and sisters of color, our undocumented, or Muslim, or LGBT brothers and sisters, it is up to us to get in their faces and to put our bodies on the line in order to protect those that need protecting.

In short, rather than allowing our privilege(s) to tell us “we’ll be fine”, let us put the resources our privilege affords us to work – in the service of those under attack, and in the service of fundamental societal change.

Let’s put our time and money into progressive and radical organizations that serve communities under threat and that work towards fundamental change. Organize, strategize.

Let’s put our energy, time and effort into educating, challenging and mobilizing those around us.

And let’s listen to those most under threat. And let’s use our resources to support them in their struggles.

Only then will we all be fine. Let’s get working.

Markus Gerke & Cliff Leek, Nov 2016

Illustrations by Clay Darcy

Advertisements

4 Responses to “Trump’s America: Will “we” be fine? Depends on who is “we”. Depends on what “we” do.”

  1. carlypuch November 20, 2016 at 5:42 pm #

    Wow! Thank you so much for this post. It so articulates my thoughts from the last couple of weeks. I cannot wait to share.

  2. Rick Rome November 23, 2016 at 2:00 pm #

    Outstanding!!

  3. Masculinities 101 January 20, 2017 at 10:05 am #

    Reblogged this on Masculinities 101.

  4. Joe Doe January 25, 2017 at 6:50 pm #

    I hate to defend trump because I really, really do not like him….
    1) “unapologetically racist” – Provide evidence
    2) “vowed to block people from entering the US because of their religion” – he’s blocking people coming from nations that generate the most violent terrorists. If the countries can not provide background information for applicants the applicants will not be allowed entry into the USA. This is not BECAUSE of their religion, but because of the fact that 99% of suicide bombings and mass killings around the world in 2016 were by people indoctrinated into extremist ideologies inside these nations.
    3)”who has repeatedly called Latinos rapists and criminals, and who has promised to tear families apart by deporting millions of Latinos” – this is cherry picking, trump followed up the statement that latinos were rapists and criminals with “a lot of them are good people.” He is not an eloquent speaker and cherry picking statements devoid of context only allows you to argue against a point that does not exist. The only people you will convince are on your own side and anybody with half a brain will see through your deceptive tactics and stop listening to you. Also, if they did not want to be deported they should have never crossed the border illegally. The statement “illegal immigrants are all criminals” is factually correct because they all broke the law and became criminals when they entered the country illegally.
    4)”will certainly threaten access to safe abortions” – see roe vs wade. women will almost certainly always have the right to have an abortion. It will be a medical procedure by a qualified professional. What you are arguing for is the “right” to free, tax payer funded, abortions. Be specific, otherwise, you are being dishonest.
    5)”boasted about sexual assault and who is normalizing misogynist language in the public sphere” – trump said women let him grab them by the pussy. that implies consent. He did not say he forced them to do anything and he never stipulated, although he implied, that he had actually done that before. Also, trump has never said anything about all women, he has just used aggressive language to women who were, in his defense (and I really hate arguing in his defense!), aggressive to him first in their language.
    6)”by voting for Trump’s white supremacist agenda” – I am a black man and when I read stuff like this… I am supremely glad trump won the election. I did not vote for him but when I read words like that, I don’t think you know how much I wish he did. I think people who think like this are racists and I am glad their candidate is not in the oval office.
    7) “no qualms threatening and attacking minority communities in schools, on college campuses, at workplaces, and on the streets” you are not talking about the 4 racist black people that kidnapped and assaulted a mentally handicapped white person, are you? Please, citation needed for this claim because it is redonculous!
    8) “being able to sit this election out because we don’t agree with either candidate – as opposed to voting for who we perceive as the lesser evil in order to protect the basic human rights of communities of color – that is privilege.” – I suppose this article is directed at white people right? refer to my previous point where I called the author a Racist.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s

%d bloggers like this: